VR Gaming & Tourism Using NANITE Technology
- 1, ,
- 2, UG Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering Prathyusha Engineering College, Chennai, IN
- 3, UG Student, Department of Computer Science and Engineering Prathyusha Engineering College, Chennai, IN
Conclusion
In conclusion, the
project represents a groundbreaking step forward in the realms of gaming and
tourism, leveraging Virtual Reality (VR) technology to provide immersive and
accessible experiences for users worldwide. Through the integration of advanced
technologies like the Oculus Meta Quest 2 VR headset and Unreal Engine, the
platform offers visually stunning and dynamic 3D environments that transport
users to dream destinations. The emphasis on interactive game play elements
enhances user engagement and fosters a sense of exploration and discovery,
while the affordability and accessibility of the platform democratize travel
and gaming experiences. By addressing the growing demand for immersive
entertainment options and overcoming traditional limitations of physical
travel, the project opens up new possibilities for exploration and adventure.
References
1.
Al-Kodmany, K.
(2002). Visualization tools and methods in community planning:from freehand
sketches to virtual reality. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(2),189–211.
2.
Allison, D., Wills,
B., Bowman, D., Wineman, J., & Hodges, L. F. (1997). The virtual reality
gorilla exhibit. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 17(6), 30–38.
3.
Barfield, W. (2006).
Intellectual property rights in virtual environments: considering the rights of
owners, programmers and virtual avatars. Akron Law Review, 39, 649–700.
4.
Gimblett, H. R.,
Richards, M. T., & Itami, R. M. (2001). Geographic simulation of wilderness
recreation behavior. Journal of Forestry, 99, 36–42.
5.
Goodall, B.,
Pottinger, G., Dixon, T., & Russell, H. (2004). Heritage property, tourism
and the UK Disability Discrimination Act. Property Management, 22(5), 345–357
6.
Jacobson, J., &
Holden, L. (2005). The virtual Egyptian temple. World Conference on Educational
Multimedia Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Montreal, Canada.
7.
Kenderdine, K.
(2004). Avatars at the flying palace: stereographic panoramas of Angkor
Cambodia. In International Conference on Hypermedia and Interactivity in
Museums (pp.1–24), Berlin.
8.
Pose, R., &
Regan, M. (1994). Techniques for reducing virtual reality latency with
architectural support and consideration of human factors. In P. Brusilovsky, P.
Kommers, & N. Streitz (Eds.), Multimedia, hypermedia, and virtual reality:
Models, systems, and application, LNCS 1077 (pp. 117–129).
9.
Mikropoulos, T. A.
(2006). Presence: a unique characteristic in educational virtual environments.
Virtual Reality, 10, 197–206.
10.
Minogue, J., Jones,
M. G., Broadwell, B., & Oppewall, T. (2006). The impact of haptic
augmentation on middle school students’ conceptions of the animal cell. Virtual
Reality, 10, 293–305.
11.
Seidel, I., &
Berger, H. (2007). Integrating electronic institutions with 3D virtual worlds.
Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent
Agent Technology (pp.481–484), Silicon Valley, California, 2–5 November.
12.
Vlahakis, V.,
Ioannidis, N., Karigiannis, J., Tsotros, M., Gounaris, M., Stricker, D., et al.
(2002). Archeoguide: an augmented reality guide for archaeological sites. IEEE
Computer Graphics and Applications, 22(5), 52–60.
13.
Song, K. S., &
Lee, W. Y. (2002). A virtual reality application for geometry classes. Journal
of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 149–156.
14.
Waitt, G. (2000).
Consuming heritage: perceived historical authenticity. Annals of Tourism
Research, 27(4), 835–862.
15.
Wang, N. (1999).
Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research,
26(2), 349–370.
Keywords: Virtual Reality (VR), 3D environments, Tourism, Conventional travel, Virtual world.
Citation: Karthick *, Karthick ( 2024), VR Gaming & Tourism Using NANITE Technology. , 12(1): 1-5
Received: 22/02/2024; Accepted: 29/03/2024;
Published: 14/09/2024
