Uterine Cancer: Review
Akhila K R1, R Jemila
Rose2, Sylaja Valli Narayan3, D
Hevin Rajesh
1Lecturer, Department of Computing, Muscat College, akhilakr85@gmail.com
2Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology, St.Xavier's catholic College of
Engineering, Chunkankadai, Jemila@sxcce.edu.in
3Assistant Professor, Department of Information Technology, NarayanaGuru College of Engineering,
sylajanarayan@gmail.com
4Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology, St.Xavier's
catholic College of Engineering, Chunkankadai,
hevin@sxcce.edu.in
Abstract: - The
uterine cancer can be viewed by the ultrasound scan (or) MRI scans. The
ultrasound scanned image is taken for the entire process. The ultrasound scan
is more comfortable than MRI scan for diagnosis. It is not affecting the human
body because it does not use a radiation. Ultrasound doesn’t emit radiation.
There are different types of algorithms were developed for uterine cancer
detection. An ultrasound device uses sound waves that can’t be heard by humans.
The sound waves make a pattern of echoes as the bounce off organs inside the
pelvis. Echoes’ create a picture of uterus.
Keywords:
Ultrasound, Cancer, Uterus
1.
Introduction:
Uterine cancer is also known as endometrial cancer. The two main types
of endometrial cancer are: [1] Endometroid adenocarcinoma [2] Uterine
carcinosarcoma
Endometroid
Adenocarcinoma: This type of uterine cancer forms
in the glandular cells of uterine lining, it accounts for as much as 75 present of all uterine cancers. Endometroid adenocarcinoma
commonly detected early and as a high cure rate.
Uterine
Carcinosarcoma: This rate form uterine cancer felt
to be an endometrial cancer. It has elements of both adenocarcinoma and
sarcoma. These cancer have a high risk of spread to
lymph nodes and other parts of the body. Ultrasound or ultrasonogrphy
is a medical imaging technique. Ultrasound is used in medicine to view internal
organs of the body. It can also use to locate objects. Ultrasound scans are used
to detect problems in the liver, heart and kidney (or) uterine. That uses high
frequency sound waves and their echoes. The sound waves travel in to our body
and a boundary between tissues. The most noticeable advantages of ultrasound
scanning are safety, cost effectiveness, speed, easy handling and portability.
Ultrasound is based on the principle of sound wave echoes. Sound wave travels
from the probe to the object, passes through it and is continuously reflected
back to the probe from multiple points inside the object. Ultrasound involves
sound wave of frequency in the range of megahertz; typically
this ranges between 3.5-10 MHz the machine display the two dimensional image.
The quality of ultrasound images is limited by granular speckle noise. This makes
it difficult to segment the images. The image is pre-processed in order to crop
it such that unnecessary portions as well as the speckle noise are removed. We
use a morphological cleaning algorithm to clean the image. Then it is segmented
by an algorithm which uses a collection of rules to locate the cancer and
morphological concepts to segment the image.
2. Methods
A) Image Segmentation
In
computer vision, image segmentation[2] is the process
of partitioning a digital image into multiple segments (sets of pixels, also
known as super pixels). The goal of segmentation[4] is
to simplify and/or change the representation of an image into something that is
more meaningful and easier to analyse. Image segmentation[5]
is typically used to locate objects and boundaries (lines, curves, etc.) in
images. Image segmentation [6,7] is a set of segments that collectively cover
the entire image, or a set of contours extracted from the image (edge detection)[11]. Each of the pixels in a region is similar
with respect to some characteristic or computed property, such as colour,
intensity, or texture. Some methods are using in to the image extracted for
image segmentation [8,9].
There
are four methods such as
1. Clustering method [1]
2. Thresholding method
3. Edge detection method [10]
4. Region growing method
The
purpose of edge detection is to mark the points in a digital image at which the
luminous intensity changes sharply. In Image analysis process to interpret an
image, one first must be able to detect the edges of each object in the image.
Edge representation of an image significantly reduces the amount of data to be
processed, yet it retains useful information about the shapes of objects in the
scene.
B) Image Feature Extraction and Detection
The
goal of feature extraction[3] is to improve the
effectiveness and efficiency of analysis and classification. This may be done
by
1)
Eliminating redundancy in the image data[12,13].
2)
Eliminating variability in the image data that is of little of no value in classification
-even discarding entire images if that is appropriate.
3)
Restructuring the data (in feature space) in order to optimize the performance
of the classifier[14,15].
4)
Extracting spatial information (texture, size, shape) which is crucial to target
identification[16]. That is, one would like to 1)
minimize the number (and detail) of the features, 2) maximize pattern discrimination[17].
Conclusion:
The
ultrasound methods are used in medical image processing. It can be used to give
more information about cancer detection, segmentation and classification. The
target area is segmented and the evaluation of this tool from the doctor and
this helps the doctors in diagnosis, the treatment plan making and state of the
cancer monitoring.
Future Work:
In
future we can improve the efficiency of image. The system can be improved by
adapting more segmentation algorithm to suit the different medical image
segmentation. Using colour based image segmentation.
It is possible to reduce the computational cost avoiding feature calculation
for every pixel in the image. Like ultrasound diagnosis tool also use other
diagnosis tool to detect cancer and also detected ratio will be estimated
easily.
REFERENCES
1.
Ajala Funmilola A, Oke O.A, Adedeji T.O, Alade O.M, Adewusi E.A (2014), ‘Fuzzy k-c-means Clustering Algorithm
for Medical Image Segmentation’, vol 2, pp 271-286.
2.
Dilliraj.E, P.Vadivu,
A.Anbarasi (2014), ‘MR Brain Image Segmentation Based
on Self- Organizing Map and Neural Network’, International Journal for Research
in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET), Vol 2 , pp
2321-9653.
3.
Hayit Greenspan , Shiri
Gordon, Gali Zimmerman, Shelly Lotenberg,
Jose Jeronimo, Sameer Antani, and Rodney Long (2009),
‘Automatic Detection of Anatomical Landmarks in Uterine Cervix Images’, IEEE
TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING , vol. 28, pp 304-315.
4.
Krishna Kant Singh, Akansha Singh (2010), ‘A Study of
Image Segmentation Algorithms for Different Types of Images’, IJCSI, Vol. 7, pp
414-417.
5.
Mahesh Yambal1, Hitesh Gupta2 (2014), ‘Image Segmentation using Fuzzy C Means
Clustering: A survey’, Vol. 2, pp 74-84.
6.
Narendran.P, V.K. Narendira
Kumar, K. Somasundaram, (2012), ‘3D Brain Tumors and
Internal Brain Structures Segmentation in MR Images’, I.J. Image, Graphics and
Signal Processing, pp 35-48.
7.
Neofytou, V. Tanos, I.
Constantinou, E. C. Kyriacou, M. S. Pattichis, and C. S. Pattichis
(2015), ‘Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Hysteroscopic Imaging’, IEEE journal of
biomedical and health informatics, vol. 19, pp 43-54.
8.
Ratha Jeyalakshmi and Ramar Kadarkarai (2010),
‘Segmentation and feature extraction of fluid-filled uterine fibroid–A
knowledge-based approach’, Maejo International
Journal of Science and Technology, pp. 1905-7873
9.
Sudipta Roy, Atanu Saha and Prof. Samir K. Bandyopadhyay (2014), ‘Brain Tumor Segmentation and Quantification from MRI of Brain’,
Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, Vol 2, pp 274-291.
10.
Snehal N. Patil; Prof. Dr. K.V.Kulhalli; Smita
S. Patil (2014) , ‘ Endometrial Cancer Detection using Image Processing
Techniques’, International Journal of Software & Hardware Research in
Engineering. Vol 2, pp 2347-4890.
11.
Jemila Rose & S Allwin,
Clustering of Ultrasound Cervix Image Using Objective Function, West Indian
Medical Journal, DOI
10.7727/ wimj.2016.118., 2016, ISSN: 0043-3144(print)
12. R Jemila Rose & S Allwin, Classification of Cervical Cancer Using Ultrasound Images, Asian Journal of Research in Social
Sciences and Humanities, ISSN: 2249-7315 (online), Accepted for Publications, July 2016
13. Jemila Rose, R & Allwin,
S 2015, ‘Denoising of Ultrasound Cervix Image Using Improved Anisotropic
Diffusion Filter (IADF)’, West Indian Medical Journal, ISSN: 0043-3144 (print),
University of West Indies, DOI: 10.7727/wimj.2014.235
14. Jemila Rose, R & Allwin,
S 2013, ‘Ultrasound
Cervical Cancer Based Abnormality Segmentation Using Adaptive Fuzzy C-Mean
Clustering’, Academic
Journal of Cancer Research, vol.6(1), pp.01-07, ISSN 1995-8943, © IDOSI
Publications, DOI: 10.5829/idosi.ajcr. 2013.6.1. 7324
15. Jemila Rose, R
& Allwin, S
2014, ‘Speckle Suppressing Improved Oriented Speckle Reducing Anisotropic
Diffusion (IOSRAD) Filter for Medical Ultrasound Images’, Applied Mechanics and
Materials, vol.
626, pp.106-110 © Trans Tech Publications, ISSN print 1660-9336, Switzerland
doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net /AMM.626. 106
16.
V Vinisha , R Jemila
Rose, Classification of Cervical Cancer Using Ultrasound Images, ERES
International Journal of Bio Signal and Image Processing, Vol. 3, No 1,
February – April 2016
17. Jemila Rose, R
& Allwin, S
2013, ’Computerized cancer Detection and Classification using Ultrasound
Images: A survey’, International Journal of Engineering Research and
Development. ISSN: 2278-067X, p-ISSN: 2278-800X, www.ijerd.com, vol.5, issue 7
(January 2013), pp. 36-47.